USPTO serial 78542702
IPTUNES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPTUNES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger, Esq.,Thomas J. McWilliams, Esq.
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER, ESQ; THOMAS J MC REED SMITH LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYPO BOX 7990PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101-7990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications access services, namely subscription-based access service featuring a device that allows the user to access high speed transmission of audio and data via a global computer network, computers and wireless devices. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |