Drawing for SIWIN

USPTO serial 78543873

SIWIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIWIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M HOPE AGUILAR

M HOPE AGUILAR ARVIC SEARCH SERVICES521 3RD AVE SW STE 280CALGARY, AB T2P 3T3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, and fruit sauces, namely, cranberry and apple sauce; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance