Drawing for DISCOVERY TURBO

USPTO serial 78544117

DISCOVERY TURBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY TURBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony V. Lupo

Anthony V. Lupo ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded video tapes and cassettes, compact and video discs, CD-ROMs and audio-visual recordings for home and educational uses featuring proprietary television programming in the field of motor vehicles and transportation; computer game software, computer game programsACTIVE—
038television broadcasting servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing series of television programs in the field of motor vehicles and transportationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 31, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance