USPTO serial 78544273
PROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Glassman
Mike Humphreys Western States Wholesale1420 S. Bon ViewOntario, CA 91761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | dry powder thinset mortar that improves the bond strength for tiling over plywood or vinyl and remains flexible | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |