USPTO serial 78544526
RFCC ALL STAR TOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RFCC ALL STAR TOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | G & S: Organizing and conducting inline skating tours, featuring the top inline skaters from all over the world; traveling demostrating and promoting inline skating and it's manufactures; Video games and musical competitions, inline skating and band concerts; organizing and conducting entertainment events and contests in the nature of competitions, jumping, sliding, races, exhibitions and skills-based events for inline skating; organizing and conducting fashion shows, autograph signing and exhibition of film and videotapes; entertainment services in the nature of musical festivals, musical competitions and band concerts, contests in the nature of competitions, jumping, races, exhibitions and skills-based events for inline skating and other board or platform-based sports, fashion shows, and exhibitions of still photographs film and videotapes; entertainment services in the nature of inline skating; entertainment services, namely the production and distribution of television programs, cable television programs, musical and audio programs; video photograph exhibitions and webcast television or video programs via a global computer network; education services, namely providing courses of instruction in the fields of inline skating; publication of books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |