Drawing for WE PICK UP.  AND WE DELIVER.

USPTO serial 78545096

WE PICK UP. AND WE DELIVER.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE PICK UP. AND WE DELIVER.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben D. Tobor

Ben D. Tobor Greenberg Traurig, LLP1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 1800Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Waste disposal for others and collection of trashACTIVE—
039Garbage collection and transport by truckACTIVE—
040Recycling and waste treatment services; sorting of waste and recyclable materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 30, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 13, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance