Drawing for Serial No. 78545158

USPTO serial 78545158

Serial No. 78545158

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78545158?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry I. Friedman, Esq.

BARRY I FRIEDMAN ESQ METZ LEWIS LLC11 STANWIX ST STE 18PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-1312UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, VESTS, SHRUGS, SOCKS, SHOES, HATS, HEAD BANDS AND UNDERGARMENTSACTIVE—
035DISTRIBUTORSHIPS AND ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING MEDICAL MONITORING DEVICES FOR DETECTING, STORING AND REPORTING HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY AND HEALTH AND FITNESS BY DISTRIBUTING PRINTED MATERIALS AND BY PROVIDING INFORMATION OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY, HEALTH AND FITNESS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 5, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance