USPTO serial 78545158
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry I. Friedman, Esq.
BARRY I FRIEDMAN ESQ METZ LEWIS LLC11 STANWIX ST STE 18PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-1312UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, VESTS, SHRUGS, SOCKS, SHOES, HATS, HEAD BANDS AND UNDERGARMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIPS AND ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING MEDICAL MONITORING DEVICES FOR DETECTING, STORING AND REPORTING HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY AND HEALTH AND FITNESS BY DISTRIBUTING PRINTED MATERIALS AND BY PROVIDING INFORMATION OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS CONFERENCES, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY, HEALTH AND FITNESS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |