Drawing for VARIABLE APERTURE TRANSDUCER

USPTO serial 78545441

VARIABLE APERTURE TRANSDUCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARIABLE APERTURE TRANSDUCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Dergosits

Christina Ezell5133 Harding Rd., B-10, PMB200Nashville, TN 37205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audio loudspeakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 25, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 25, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 16, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 16, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 12, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance