USPTO serial 78545922
FOREVER DIAMONDS COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOREVER DIAMONDS COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Voelzke, Esq.
JOEL D VOELZKE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE OF JOEL400 CORPORATE POINTE, STE 300CULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather straps; leather bags; suitcases and wallets; leather purses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |