Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78545972?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78545972. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MYSTERY HACKER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78545972, the listed owner(s) include: Grady R Johnston II.

What is USPTO serial number 78545972?

Serial number 78545972 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MYSTERY HACKER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of MYSTERY HACKER?

MYSTERY HACKER (78545972) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover MYSTERY HACKER?

The public record lists International Classes: 042, 045. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: MYSTERY HACKER Serial# 78545972 | status 614; last event PETD | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYSTERY HACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Grady R Johnston II
Avondale Estates, GA
Other trademarks owned by Grady R Johnston II

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
042	IT Security Services Network Security Services Security Assesments Corporate Hacker Security Services	ACTIVE	—
045	Consulting and legal services in the field of privacy and security laws, regulations, and requirements 045 On-line security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions Computer security services in the nature of providing an internet trust center, namely, computer security assurance and administration of digital keys and digital certificates Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of [indicate what is being monitored]	INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 4, 2006	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
May 26, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
May 26, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 9, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 26, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

MYSTERY HACKER