Drawing for 21ST CENTURY

USPTO serial 78545983

21ST CENTURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 21ST CENTURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Motaz M. Gerges

MOTAZ M GERGES ATTORNEY AT LAW1230 ROSECRANS AVE STE 405MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029canned goodsACTIVENov 29, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance