USPTO serial 78546106
PARENTS-IN-ACTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARENTS-IN-ACTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip H. Kier
PHILIP H KIER321 HOME AVEOAK PARK, IL 60302-3403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | series of books written by educators and directed to parents of public school children; These books provide information and advice relating to typical school experiences, most particularly the inter-relationships between parents, their children and their schools; These books attempt to teach parents the skills to make their children successful in school and to reduce the stress on families when problems occur; Information is provided through stories, insights and observations, as well as statements representing both fact and opinion; The series will include books covering a number of topics relating to parent involvement in school | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |