CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GLOBAL THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

USPTO serial 78546187

GLOBAL THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL THOUGHT LEADERSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard Sobelman

HOWARD SOBELMAN SNELL & WILMER LLPONE ARIZONA CTR 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely graduate-level studies in the field of international management; non-degree programs and classes for studies in language and finance; executive education programs for an executive MBA in international management; certificate programs offered over the Internet in the field of international managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance