USPTO serial 78546476
INSTIL HEALTH INCHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTIL HEALTH INCHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. CRAIG KILLOUGH
B CRAIG KILLOUGH BARNWELL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMSPO BOX HCHARLESTON, SC 29402-0197UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | HEALTH CARE CASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT AND UTILIZATION REVIEW SERVICES; COST MANAGEMENT FOR THE HEALTH CARE BENEFIT PLANS OF OTHERS; HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT; HEALTH CARE COST REVIEW; MANAGED CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF HEALTH CARE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | HEALTH CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG CLAIM ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG CLAIMS PROCESSING; PROVIDING HEALTH CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG CLAIM INFORMATION; ADMINISTRATION OF PRE-PAID HEALTH CARE PLANS; UNDERWRITING HEALTH INSURANCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INSTIL HEALTH INCHOICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |