Drawing for CRUZAN ISLANDS

USPTO serial 78547162

CRUZAN ISLANDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUZAN ISLANDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, footwear, shoes, athletic shoes, sandals, aqua shoes, sport sandals, canvas shoes, soccer shoes, dress sandals, boat shoes, slippers, t-shirts, jerseys, baseball shirts, sweat shirts, sweat pants, swim wear, dresses, jackets, pants, night shirts, skirts, robes, caps, hats, visors, belts, pajamas, shorts, socks, lingerie, underwear, bandannas, neckties, camp shirts, boxer shorts, sleep pants, sleep shorts, nightgowns, yoga/exercise pants, jogging suits, shirts, tropical shirts, tropical shorts, polo shirts, dress shirts and loungewearACTIVE—
035Retail store services in the field of clothing, accessories, novelties, housewares, bar equipment and sporting goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 15, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 28, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 18, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance