Drawing for JILL STUART

USPTO serial 78547294

JILL STUART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JILL STUART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

Jay Begler Niesar Whyte & Vestal90 New Montgomery StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cosmetic brushes for applying make-up, eyebrow brushes, nail brushes, hair brushes, hair combs, brushes, spatulas, wedges, rounds, squares, puffs and sponges, all for cosmetic use, toothbrushes, cosmetic bowls, cosmetic containers sold empty, fitted vanity cases, facial sponges for applying makeup, soap dispensers, and perfume atomizers sold empty, perfume sprayers sold empty, perfume burners; Tableware being plates, bowls, dishes, soup bowls, serving plates and dishes, salad bowls, saucers, cups, drinking glasses, cases for hair combs, sponges for household purposes, brushes for cleaning pots, brushes for cleaning footwear, dishwashing brushes, glass beverage ware and crystal beverage ware namely, wine drinking glasses, goblets, water drinking glasses; decanters, mugs, cups, saucers, rolling pins, jugs, glass storage jars, butter dishes and butter dish covers, cookie jars, egg cups, sugar bowls, non-electric coffee percolators, non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal, hand-operated coffee grinders, non-electric kettles, teapots not of precious metal, tea strainers, soap holders, soap dishes, soap dispensers, toilet brushes, toilet paper holders, plastic bath racks and towel bars, dustbins, empty bottles, glass boxes, bread boxes, bread boards, candle holders not of precious metal, china ornaments, coasters not of paper or linen, cork screws, cooking pots, cookware, namely, roasting pans, cooking skewers of metal, ice buckets for cooling wine bottles, lids for cooking pots and pans, frying pans, saucepans, ice buckets, figurines and statuettes of porcelain, terra cotta or glass; flasks, flower pots, cookery molds, napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal, paper plates, hand-operated pepper mills not of precious metal, salt cellars not of precious metal, perfume bottles and perfume vaporizers sold empty, fitted picnic baskets, pie servers, powder compacts sold empty not of precious metal, shaving brushes, shaving brush stands, tea caddies, tea infusers not of precious metal, toothpick holders not of precious metal, toothpicks, vases not of precious metal, serving trays not of precious metal, and serviette rings not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance