USPTO serial 78547835
GREEN LIGHT G.I.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN LIGHT G.I.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Markus Cohen
TORONTO ONC - ONTARIO M4T 2S3MARKUS COHEN; MARKUS COHEN LAW OFFICESTE 1010; 22 ST CLAIR AVE E,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books and magazines on weight loss/maintenance, recipes and exercise; publications, namely, pamphlets, brochures, leaflets, flyers, textbooks in the field of dieting | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Frozen prepared meals consisting of fish, meats, vegetables; margarine substitutes; processed and canned fruits; cheese-, fruit- and vegetable-based spreads; poultry; soups and chowders; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cheese; cooking oil, margarine; butter and substitutes therefor; canned and frozen fruits; canned vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereals, muesli, grain-based nutrition bars; table syrup; sugarless candies; salad dressings; sauces; sugarless and fat-reduced wafers; desserts, namely, puddings, soufflés and mousses; frozen yogurt and ice cream; pasta; baked goods, namely, breads, cookies, muffins, cakes and scones; packaged mixes, namely, gravy mixes, salad dressing mixes, cake mixes, and pancake mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Supervision of diet programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |