USPTO serial 78548072
SPORTSBUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPORTSBUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Broadcast Live Technologies Inc.
Victoria, British Columbia, CA
Broadcast Live Technologies Inc.
Victoria, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Gordon Thomson
J. Gordon Thomson J. Gordon Thomson, Law CorporationP.O. Box 8865Station CentralVictoria, B.C., V8W3Z1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radio receivers and accessories therefor, namely, radio receiver carry straps, radio receiver belt clips, containers for radio receivers, pouches for radio receivers, specialty collector cases for radio receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 31, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |