Drawing for BROADWAY STAR

USPTO serial 78548191

BROADWAY STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BROADWAY STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller, Jennifer B. Hodulik and Christina Liu

Susan L. Heller Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs; electronically or magnetically activated pre-paid telephone debit cards; eyeglasses and sunglasses; gaming machines; gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without video outputABANDONED—
028Stand alone video game machines, LCD game machines, hand held unit for playing electronic games, but specifically excluding dice games and computer software gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance