USPTO serial 78548448
ABBYY EFORMFILLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABBYY EFORMFILLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accounting machines, acoustic conduits, adding machines, amplifiers, audiovisual teaching apparatus, namely, photograph projection apparatus, automatic steering apparatus for vehicles, blueprint apparatus, namely, scanners, calculating disks, namely, removable external storage disks using flash memory media having a universal wired or wireless interface for use in the field of optical character recognition, calculating machines, cash registers, central processing units, integrated circuits, audio-video compact discs featuring computer programs or databases in the field of optical character recognition, read-only memory compact discs featuring computer programs or databases in the field of optical character recognition, computer game programs, computer keyboards, computer memories, computer peripheral devices, namely, scanners, computers, data processing equipment, namely, couplers, data processing apparatus, namely, computers, calculators, disk drives, namely, computer disk drives for use in the field of optical character recognition, optical apparatus and instruments, namely, scanners, electro-dynamic apparatus for the remote control of signals, electric apparatus for commutation, namely, relay boxes for controlling external units, electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations, electric monitoring apparatus, namely, security cameras, electric measuring devices, namely, testers, range-finders, electric regulating apparatus, namely, monitoring modules for amplifiers and speakers, electronic agendas, electronic notice boards, electronic pens, electronic pocket translators, downloadable electronic publications recorded on disks and featuring computer programs or databases in the field of optical character recognition, facsimile machines, signaling devices, namely, flashing lights, floppy disks with recorded data in the field of optical character recognition, apparatus to check franking and stamping mail, glass covered with an electrical conductor, high-frequency apparatus, namely, radio frequency transmitters, holders for electric coils, instruments containing eyepieces, namely, spyglasses binoculars, integrated circuits, invoicing machines, juke-boxes, lens hoods, leveling instruments, light conducting filaments fibers, magnetic disks featuring computer programs or databases for use in the field of optical character recognition, magnetic encoded credit cards, magnetic encoders, magnetic identity cards, magnetic tape units for computers, mathematical instruments, namely, calculators, measuring apparatus, namely, testers, micrometer screws for optical instruments, microprocessors, optical mirrors, modems, money counting and sorting machines, computer monitors, data processing equipment, namely, computer mouse, mouse pads, notebook computers, optical apertometers, optical character readers, optical data media disks, optical discs containing pre-recorded programs or databases in the field of optical character recognition, optical glass for copying apparatus lenses, optical lenses, optical prisms for binoculars, phototelegraphy apparatus, polarimeters, precision measuring apparatus, namely, graduated rulers, printed circuits, printers for use with computers, projection apparatus, namely, photograph projection apparatus, projection screens, punched card machines for offices, radios, data processing equipment, namely, optical readers, recorded computer operating programs in the field of optical character recognition, data processing equipment, namely, scanners, semi-conductors, signaling light blinkers, blank smart cards, sound recording apparatus, sound recording carriers, namely, audio cassette recorders, recorded sound recording disks, recorded sound recording strips, sound reproduction apparatus, namely, audio disks player, teaching apparatus, namely, slide projection apparatus, telegraphs, telephone apparatus, telephone transmitters, receiving and storage apparatus, namely, telecommunications transmitting sets, vehicle radios, video game cartridges, video recorders, voting machines, word processors, wrist rests for use with computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data conversion of computer programs and data not physical conversion, duplication of computer programs, calibration, creating and maintaining web sites for others, computer programming, computer rental, computer software design, computer systems analysis, computer system design, consultancy in the field of computer hardware, conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media, copyright management, engineering; installation of computer software, graphic arts designing, industrial design, intellectual property consultancy, intellectual property monitoring services, licensing of intellectual property, maintenance of computer software, packaging design, recovery of computer data, rental of computer software, research and development for others, surveying, technical project studies in the field of image recognition, technical research in the field of image recognition, updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |