USPTO serial 78548595
THE COCOA SHOPPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3283984Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2007
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE COCOA SHOPPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lip Balm, Shampoo, Body Lotion, non-medicated Foot Lotion, Hand Lotion, Face Lotion, Hair Conditioner, Hand Soap, Body Soap, non-medicated Foot Balm, non-medicated Body Balm, Chocolate Lip Balm, Solid Perfume, Handmade soaps, baby soaps, sensitive skin soaps, bath salts, lip gloss, lip stick, natural lip balm | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
| 004 | Chocolate Candles; Aromatherapy Candles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alcove Packaging
- Other trademarks owned by Alcove Packaging
- Other trademarks owned by Alcove Packaging
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named THE COCOA SHOPPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |