Drawing for MAXIMUM MARKETING

USPTO serial 78549135

MAXIMUM MARKETING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIMUM MARKETING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARRETT M. WEBER

GARRETT M WEBER LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP4200 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing and consulting services in the field of grain trading and grain market analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 24, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 24, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance