Drawing for X3-45

USPTO serial 78549202

X3-45

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X3-45?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. White

EDWARD T. WHITE HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLPRIVERFRONT PLAZA, EAST TOWER951 EAST BYRD STREETRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Buses and parts therefor specifically excluding tires, pneumatics, tubes and tires related productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 3, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 9, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 22, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 10, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 10, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 19, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance