Drawing for 123 INSURE.COM

USPTO serial 78550541

123 INSURE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 123 INSURE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER M. FALKENSTEIN

PETER M FALKENSTEIN JAFFE RAITT HEUER & WEISS PC201 S MAIN ST STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Insurance consultation; insurance services, namely, providing individuals or businesses with an evaluation and measurement of insurance needs and binding insurance coverage online; financial evaluation for insurance purposes; insurance premium rate computing; providing online information in insurance matters; and online insurance brokerageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 26, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 14, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance