Drawing for BEAUTY THROUGH SCIENCE

USPTO serial 78550854

BEAUTY THROUGH SCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUTY THROUGH SCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skincare products namely, facial cleansers, facial lotions, facial moisturizers, facial serums, eye creams, eye serums, anti wrinkle lotions, anti wrinkle creams, beauty serums and facial masksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 14, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 8, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance