Drawing for PARDUS CAPITAL PARTNERS

USPTO serial 78550888

PARDUS CAPITAL PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARDUS CAPITAL PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karol A Kepchar, Esq.

KAROL A KEPCHAR ESQ AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial and investment management services, namely, public and private investment funds management, the management of investment assets for separate account clients, investment consultation and advice, asset management and securities trading, and the provision of financial advice and investment information offered in conjunction with the above services; and providing all of these services via global computer networks, including the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance