USPTO serial 78550972
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tredegar National Civil War Center Foundation
Richmond, VA
Other trademarks owned by Tredegar National Civil War Center Foundation
Tredegar National Civil War Center Foundation
Richmond, VA
Other trademarks owned by Tredegar National Civil War Center Foundation
THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR CENTER AT TREDEGAR
RICHMOND, VA
Other trademarks owned by THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR CENTER AT TREDEGAR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin C. Vance
Robin C. Vance MCGUIREWOODS LLP901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4063UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | museum services; educational and entertainment services, namely, exhibitions, symposiums, conferences, workshops, presentations, demonstrations, performances and interactive exhibits, all in the field of history | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |