USPTO serial 78551467
MIGENIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIGENIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
Douglas T. Johnson Miller & Martin PLLC832 Georgia AvenueSuite 1000 Volunteer BuildingChattanooga, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |