USPTO serial 78551647
DRS SECURESCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRS SECURESCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
Minsk, BY
Other trademarks owned by Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
Minsk, BY
Other trademarks owned by Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Eliseeva
Maria Eliseeva HOUSTON ELISEEVA LLP420 BEDFORD ST STE 155LEXINGTON, MA 02420-1522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | X-ray apparatus for use on the human body to detect prohibited objects or substances for security purposes | ABANDONED | Aug 17, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
- Other trademarks owned by Naychno-Proizvodstvennoe Chastnoe Unitarnoe Predpriyatie "ADANI"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DRS SECURESCAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |