Drawing for COMPUPLACER

USPTO serial 78551694

COMPUPLACER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUPLACER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise I. Mroz

Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the assessment and instruction of computer and digital literacy skills of elementary through high school students, college students, employed adults and adults seeking employmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2007NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Jun 25, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 5, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 31, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 26, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance