CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SOYA TNUVA

USPTO serial 78551775

SOYA TNUVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3248943Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2007
Examiner
GAN, REBECCAH
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SOYA TNUVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NANCY SABARRA

FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Based on 44(d) Priority Application 174529) Soy based food products, namely, soy, dried and processed soy beans, soy bean oil, soy based snacks, tofu, soy based cheese, soy based meat substitutes, soy based poultry substitutes, soy protein for use as a food additive, soy based yogurts, soy cream, soy bean extracts for use as whiteners for coffee, soy based beverages, namely, soy milk in liquid and solid formSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
030(Based on 44(d) Priority Application 174530) Soy based food products, namely, soy flour, soy flour for food, soy based ice cream, soy based desserts, soy based puddings; soy sauce, sauces made of soy, bread improvers containing soy; soy based shakes and bases for making soy based shakesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
032(Based on 44(d) Priority Application 174531) Soy based beverages not intended as a milk substitute and preparations for making soy-based beverages not intended as a milk substituteSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 29, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 29, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Aug 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance