USPTO serial 78552304
THE BIG BAD WOOF ESSENTIALS FOR THE SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS PET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BIG BAD WOOF ESSENTIALS FOR THE SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS PET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan C. Chaires and Lorri Williams
Susan C. Chaires and Lorri Williams CHAIRES & ASSOCIATES927 15TH STREET, NW 12TH FLOOR3 MCPHERSON SQUAREWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | pet feeding dishes and bowls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BIG BAD WOOF INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BB Woof, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BB Woof, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named THE BIG BAD WOOF ESSENTIALS FOR THE SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS PET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |