Drawing for PRODIGY BLEND

USPTO serial 78552411

PRODIGY BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PRODIGY BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Pettis, Jr.,

DAVID W PETTIS JR DAVID W PETTIS, JR PA1210 MILLENNIUM PKWY STE 2010BRANDON, FL 33511-0833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, whole bean and groundABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 16, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 16, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 16, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 28, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance