USPTO serial 78553100
"THE SWEET POTATO THANG"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "THE SWEET POTATO THANG"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | The Sweet Potato Thang is a dessert | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |