USPTO serial 78553324
THREAD TEDS BY THREAD BEARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4355828Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2013
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THREAD TEDS BY THREAD BEARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kingman, AZ
Kingman, AZ
Kingman, AZ
Shelby TWP, MI
Shelby TWP, MI
Kingman, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Collectables in the nature of Bears, Dolls and Animals, all the forgoing jointed and crocheted, sewn, felted and soft sculpted from various fibers and materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Petersen, Emma L.
- Other trademarks owned by Petersen, Emma L.
- Other trademarks owned by Petersen, Emma L.
- Other trademarks owned by Aucoin, Susan L.
- Other trademarks owned by Aucoin, Susan L.
- Other trademarks owned by Aucoin, Susan L.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named THREAD TEDS BY THREAD BEARS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |