CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AVEXUS

USPTO serial 78553740

AVEXUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3160505Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AVEXUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent M. Walker

KENT M WALKER COOLEY GODWARD LLP4401 EASTGATE MALLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation for business management, production management, asset management, and service operations process management; business consultation services for helping companies effectively manage their role in the overall asset lifecycle by integrating business processes and data for manufacturing and aftermarket services within a single software solution; business consultation services for providing integrated suites of functional components that can be deployed as a complete enterprise solution or selectively integrated into a pre-existing information technology environment; business consultation services for linking software application modules and bridging report, presentation, workflow management and integration functions across software application modules and data sourcesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 26, 2001
037Consultation services with respect to maintenance, repair and overhaul of an entire range of a client's high-value, complex assets in the aviation, aerospace, defense, power generation, and transportation industriesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 26, 2001
040Consultation services with respect to the manufacture of an entire range of a client's high-value, complex assets in the aviation, aerospace, defense, power generation, and transportation industriesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 26, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 4, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 31, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 5, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 5, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 8, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 30, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance