Drawing for FILMLOOP.COM

USPTO serial 78553868

FILMLOOP.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILMLOOP.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A.W. Wong

JOI A WHITE ESQ CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303-3322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable computer software for use in downloading, uploading, transmitting, manipulating, displaying, storing and sharing data, digital images, computer graphics, video and photographs; computer software for use in downloading, uploading, transmitting, manipulating, displaying, storing and sharing data, digital images, computer graphics, video and photographs; screen saver softwareACTIVE—
035advertising services; dissemination of advertising for others via a computer and communications networkACTIVE—
042provision of information, namely data, digital images, computer graphics, video and photographs via a computer and communications network; provision of information regarding downloading, uploading, transmitting, manipulating, displaying, storing and sharing data, digital images, computer graphics, video and photographs; provision of technical support informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance