USPTO serial 78553948
CAM-DUET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAM-DUET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M. SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-ROM drives; DVD-ROM drives; CD-RW drives; external and internal DVD RW drives; computer disc drives; blank discs; blank compact discs; blank video tapes; blank video cassettes for the recording; DVD players and recorders; compact disc players and recorders; video disc players and recorders; web DVD players; DVD recorder players; portable DVD players; laserdisc players; video cassette players and recorders; audio tape players and recorders; video tape recorders; digital video recorders; videocassette recorders; optical scanners; camcorders; cameras; automobile audio and video components, namely speakers, tape players, compact disc players, video disc player; DVD players, radios, stereo tuners and receivers for telephone, audio and video, amplifiers, and preamplifiers; telephone; cellular telephone accessories, namely, cellular telephone covers not made of paper, adapters, chargers, headsets, radio headphones, radio speakers, computer speakers, stereo speakers; television sets; video projectors; headphones and headsets for use with computers; computers; computer monitors; video monitors; TV remote controls; stereos; stereo preamplifiers; audio and voice receivers; TV and video converters; audio speakers; Hi-Fi systems comprising of main loudspeakers, surround loudspeakers, center loudspeakers, subwoofers, stereo tuners, sound amplifiers, video disc player; DVD players, audio cassette decks, microphones, audio accessories, namely, electrical audio cables and electrical audio wires, video accessories, namely, electrical video cables, and electrical video wires and parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |