USPTO serial 78554002
MJM CASETRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MJM CASETRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven N. Terranova
STEVEN N. TERRANOVA WITHROW & TERRANOVA, PLLC100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVESUITE 160CARY, NC 27518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data, namely, investigation databases; and computer software in the fields of investigation and insurance fraud for creating a case database, entering investigation information in the case database, storing information in the case database for later retrieval, generating reports from information in the case database; finding a case in the case database, displaying a case in the case database; requesting investigation of a case in the case database | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Licensing of computer software, namely, an investigation case database, investigation case management, and investigation case reporting computer software | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Installation of computer software, namely, investigation case database, investigation case management, investigation case retrieval, and investigation case reporting computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, namely investigation case database, investigation case management, investigation case retrieval, and investigation case reporting computer hardware and software; licensing of intellectual property, namely, trademarks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MJM Investigations, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MJM Investigations, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MJM CASETRAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |