CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HELLGATE

USPTO serial 78554201

HELLGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELLGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin H. Kleinberg

Marvin H. Kleinberg Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP2049 Century Park East, Suite 1080Los Angeles, CA 90067-3150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ARCADE-TYPE ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAMES; COIN-OPERATED VIDEO GAMES; TOY ACTION FIGURES; TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES, TOY FIGURES MADE OF POLYSTONE, CARD GAMES, BOARD GAMES, DOLLS, TOY VEHICLES, TOY WEAPONS, ROLE PLAYING GAMES AND PUZZLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 3, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance