Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78554558?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78554558. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BIG BLAST CAN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78554558, the listed owner(s) include: WD-40 Manufacturing Company.

What is USPTO serial number 78554558?

Serial number 78554558 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BIG BLAST CAN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover BIG BLAST CAN?

The public record lists International Classes: 002, 004. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78554558

BIG BLAST CAN

Q: What is the current status of BIG BLAST CAN?

BIG BLAST CAN (78554558) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jan 26, 2005
Status date: Nov 14, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG BLAST CAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

WD-40 Manufacturing Company
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by WD-40 Manufacturing Company

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Pasulka

KATHLEEN A PASULKA PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
002	Rust prevention and corrosion control, protective, and decorative coatings	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2004
004	Lubricating oil and penetrating oil	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 28, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 14, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 14, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 31, 2007	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jun 26, 2007	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jun 26, 2007	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jun 26, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
May 18, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 1, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 8, 2007	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 8, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Dec 1, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 1, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 1, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 1, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 13, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 13, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 13, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 12, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 4, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—