USPTO serial 78554928
SELIENT BANK ON GROWTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SELIENT BANK ON GROWTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. Clayton
Catherine M. Clayton Gibbons P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and computer software recorded on computer media for application and database integration for purposes of work-flow, automated decision-making, and to allow for automated consumer contact, commercial and consumer mortgage and loan origination and point of sale processing; computer programs for business applications in the banking and financial service industries, namely, computer programs for use by lenders that automate mortgage and loan files processing, score and assess loan applications and management and reporting via local area computer networks or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized and central file management and business file management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Automated mortgage banking services, namely, providing automated consumer contact for commercial mortgage and loan origination and point of sale services, namely an outsourced service provided to lenders that automates mortgage and loan files processing, and management and reporting thereof, provided via a local area computer network or the Internet; credit reporting services, namely, providing evaluation of credit worthiness of companies and private individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application Service Provider services featuring computer programs and databases in the field of mortgage banking services featuring a loan origination system that allows automated scoring and assessment of loan applications in real time via a local area computer network or the Internet providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for application and database integration and to allow for automated consumer contact and commercial mortgage and loan origination and point of sale processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SELIENT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Homebank Technologies, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SELIENT BANK ON GROWTH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |