Drawing for DIAMOND LITES

USPTO serial 78555134

DIAMOND LITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND LITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine S. Collins

CATHERINE S COLLINS VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART LLP2851 CHARLEVOIX DR SE STE 207PPO BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546-8695

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AFTER-MARKET LIGHTS, INCLUDING LED LIGHTS, FOR VEHICLES, INCLUDING TRUCKS, SUVs, RVs, TRAILERS, BOATS, AUTOMOBILES, CAMPERS, MOTOR HOMES, SNOWMOBILES, AND ATVsACTIVEJul 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 18, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 21, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 21, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance