USPTO serial 78555296
CHEF & O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEF & O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, CA
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn Walters
KIMBERLEY CUNNINGHAM BENNETT JONES LLP1000 ATCO CTR 10035 105 STEDMONTON, AB T5J 3T2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen, packaged or prepared pizza, pizza crust, pizza sauces and pizza mixes; frozen, packaged or prepared Italian food, namely, pastas, pasta mixes, pasta sauces, spaghetti, calzones, lasagna, and Italian breads; frozen, packaged and prepared meals consisting primarily of rice, pasta, vegetables, cheese, beans, potatoes; packaged and prepared food kits, consisting primarily of crackers and dips, cheese, raw, fresh vegetables and dips, cookies; frozen, packaged and prepared children's ready to eat meals, snacks and bites, namely, frozen pizzas, perogies, calzones, pasta bowls; tortilla wraps and taco seasoning mixes; nachos, tortilla and corn chips, vegetarian food substitutes, namely, veggie burger sandwiches, vegetarian sausages; meat pies, quiches; perogies; sandwiches, breakfast products, namely, cereal bars, cereal, waffles, pancakes, and pancake and waffle mixes; baked goods, namely, breads, buns, pita bread, flour tortillas, and dough; bread mixes; ready to eat desserts and snacks, namely, brownies, muffins, cheesecakes and cakes; chocolate bars, candy, confections, namely, chocolate, candy, bubble gum, fudge and caramels, and chewing gum; fresh and frozen treats, namely, ice cream, and ice pops; chocolate and custard based pie fillings; frozen desserts, namely, sorbet, frozen ice cream bars, lollipops, and gelato; dessert mixes, namely, cake, brownie, cheesecake and pie mixes; holiday specific foods, namely, mincemeat tarts, Easter foods and Christmas foods, namely holiday cakes, pies and desserts, namely, halva, fruit pies and pastries; popcorn; pretzels and chocolate covered pretzels; ready to eat bars, namely cereal bars, and fruit ice bars; snacks, namely, fruit jellies, crackers, cookies, biscotti, biscuits, natural sweeteners and food starch in the nature of dextrose; marinades, spices; spreads, namely, mayonnaise, chocolate spreads, relishes, mustard and ketchup, barbecue sauces, salad dressings, dips, sauces, salsas, pancake syrups, gravy, granola; raw ingredients, namely, rice; pasta, processed grains and flour; bread crumbs for breading and coating; ready to eat sports energy bars made primarily from protein, hot chocolate; milk shakes, teas in bags; tea drinks, namely flavored teas, chai tea lattes; coffee drinks, namely, lattes, cappuccinos, flavored coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |