Drawing for COLORSTICKS

USPTO serial 78555357

COLORSTICKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORSTICKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis S. Ederer, Esq.

LOUIS S EDERER ESQ TORYS LLP237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-3140UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; lip and eye crayon products, namely, eye liners and lip linersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 8, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 2, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance