USPTO serial 78555436
ALPACAS OF MAPLE VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS JR, RAY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPACAS OF MAPLE VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Tingey
DAVID L TINGEY15 S GRADY WAY, STE 336RENTON, WA 98055UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Alpacas and alpaca products and services; Alpaca breeding and stud services; alpaca husbandry; alpaca breeding stud raising, training, care, agistment and showing services; and consultation and advisory services in the fields of alpaca husbandry, breeding, care, agistment, show, purchase and sale; clothing made in whole or substantially part of alpaca wool, namely shirts, hats, socks, dresses, suits, coats, pants, tops, blouses, belts, scarves, stoles, capes, sweaters, shawls, jackets, overcoats, mittens, gloves, berets, t-shirts, and sweatshirts; Retail and Wholesale Store services, retail and wholesale catalogue and on-line wholesale and retail store services all featuring Alpacas, fleece and fiber, clothing or textiles made wholly or substantially part of alpaca fleece | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |