USPTO serial 78555772
STRENGTHENING THE VALUE OF INSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3070627Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STRENGTHENING THE VALUE OF INSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven N. Terranova
STEVEN N TERRANOVA WITHROW & TERRANOVA PLLCPO BOX 1287CARY, NC 27512-1287UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Insurance claim investigation case management, namely, tracking and monitoring insurance compliance and consultation related thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 039 | Electronic storage of data in the field of insurance claim investigation cases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software in the field of insurance claim investigation case reporting for use in database management and investigation case management, retrieval and reporting; computer programming for others; computer software development, namely, development of software for others for use in database management in the field of insurance claims investigation case management, insurance claims case retrieval, and insurance investigation case reporting; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting the computer software applications of others in the fields of insurance claims investigation, insurance fraud investigations, insurance claim investigation case management, insurance claim investigation case retrieval, and insurance investigation case reporting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 045 | Providing an online computer database featuring information in the fields of insurance claims investigation and insurance fraud investigation; investigation services related to insurance claims; consultation services in the field of insurance claim investigation, insurance fraud investigation, and insurance fraud investigation case reporting via computer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MJM Investigations, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MJM Investigations, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MJM Investigations, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named STRENGTHENING THE VALUE OF INSURANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |