USPTO serial 78556161
RENTROCHESTER.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3113250Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RENTROCHESTER.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL L. SLIFKIN
NEIL L. SLIFKIN HARRIS BEACH LLP99 GARNSEY RDPITTSFORD, NY 14534-4596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Rochester, New York and Internet based service for listing apartments and residential real estate searchable by specific neighborhoods geographically located within the Greater Rochester, New York metropolitan area, whereby prospective renters can be matched with landlords | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |