USPTO serial 78556475
PROLOGICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROLOGICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brentwood, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Scharman
CHRISTOPHER A SCHARMAN HARWELL HOWARD HYNE GABBERT & MANNER, P315 DEADERICK ST STE 1800NASHVILLE, TN 37238-1800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and administration services and office functions related to the provision of brachytherapy by urologists, namely, reimbursement management, billing and collections, financial management, business planning, operations and technology management, compliance and quality control and assurance, inventory procurement and management, and business development and marketing support | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 041 | Conducting technical and clinical training and education in the field of brachytherapy and the treatment of prostate cancer | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 044 | Medical services and consultation in the field of brachytherapy and the treatment of prostate cancer | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |