USPTO serial 78557056
WHITNEY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3287800Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHITNEY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bridgeton, MO
Bridgeton, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Hazelwood, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
McPherson D. Moore
MCPHERSON D. MOORE POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESISUITE 20012412 POWERSCOURT DRIVEST. LOUIS, MO 63131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | fasteners for fastening ironing board covers to ironing boards; ironing board hooks made of metal for hanging on doors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | contact lens cases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | rolling laundry carts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | map cases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | travel bags; tote bags; shirt cases for travel; hair care tote bags; grooming organizers sold empty; jewelry pouches; tie cases; shoe cases for travel; wash bags for carrying toiletries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Laundry hampers, laundry sorters, underbed chests; jewelry cases not being of metal in the nature of hanging, flexible materials with receptacles; locker organizers in the nature of hanging, flexible materials having receptacles; clothes hangers, laundry shelves, hanger tower racks, wardrobes in the nature of free-standing closets; hamper frame connectors made of plastic; ironing board hooks made of plastic for hanging on doors; hand-operated hand-tool in the nature of a non-metal clothes line reel that contains, extends, and retracts a clothes line | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | laundry accessories, namely ironing boards, shaped ironing board covers, shaped ironing board pads, ironing board holders, rests namely holders for household irons; ironing board accessory that clamps to the board to keep the iron cord out of the way; empty spray bottles; clothes pins; clothes drying racks; empty spray bottles for ironing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | garment storage bags, shoe storage bags; clothes lines; laundry bag; laundry organizers in the nature of cloth bags; clothes pin bags; mesh pressing pads to protect clothing from shine and scorch marks during ironing; Christmas tree storage bags; wreath storage bags; general storage bags; laundry wash bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Whitney Design, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Whitney Design, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HOUSEHOLD ESSENTIALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Whitney Design, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named WHITNEY DESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |